masto.ai is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general Mastodon server for all languages.

Administered by:

Server stats:

2.2K
active users

After the , 2021 attack on the Capitol, federal prosecutors charged >350 participants in ’s mob w/ or impeding an official proceeding. The charge carries a 20-yr maximum penalty & is part of a enacted after the exposure of massive & shredding of documents during the collapse of the energy giant Enron.

Writing for the majority, Chief *Justice* said the government must establish that a defendant “impaired the availability or integrity” of records, documents or other objects used in an official proceeding. The decision returns the case to the lower courts for additional proceedings.

Justices , Sonia & Elena dissented.

’ ruling has the potential to affect the & of a small set of — around 27 — who are serving time in for only this . It also could impact about 110 more who are awaiting or sentencing, acc/to prosecutors. In addition, the ruling could affect ’s stalled trial for illegally trying to remain in power after his 2020 defeat; 2 of the 4 charges he faces are based on the statute, & he could move for dismissal.

In his opinion striking down the govt’s use of an “ of Congress” charge against defendants, Chief *Justice* repeatedly mentioned the law has a 20-yr max penalty—“one of the more severe potential punishments” for govt interference .


Nonilex

ONLY ONE defendant received a punishment that severe— ldr , who was ALSO convicted of a to keep in power. He was sentenced to 22yrs in prison. The avg sentence for a rioter w/no criminal history & convicted of no felonies other than obstruction is ~2yrs.

In , Justice noted that there is no mandatory minimum punishment. “Given the breadth of its terms, [the ] naturally encompasses actions that range in severity,” she wrote. “Congress presumably District to impose sentences with the defendant’s particular .”

In a 6-3 court split, Justice wrote a separate concurring opinion w/the majority, stating that in her view, *some* prosecutions involving the of an official proceeding statute could survive.


It is not clear how much weight Jackson’s view would carry in the lower courts, but it is an important one. Jackson’s point was that while limited the to involving the impairment of , Congress’s certification of the itself “plainly used certain records, documents or objects — including, among others, those relating to the electoral votes themselves.”

Justice , concurring w/ the 6-3 majority, suggested that the charge could still be brought against , specifically involving the actual or attempted “impairment … of the availability or integrity of things used during the proceeding.” Trump is charged w/ corruptly interfering w/ electoral vote certificates to be counted by VP .