masto.ai is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general Mastodon server for all languages.

Administered by:

Server stats:

2.1K
active users

On Tues, Americans will elect the next & hundreds of members. In doing so, voters will also shape the 3rd branch: the .

Federal — whom the picks & the confirms — have become even more powerful in recent yrs as a Congress has failed to pass major on many issues. As a result, the judiciary has shaped on , , , & more.


nytimes.com/2024/10/31/briefin

The New York Times · The 2024 Stakes for JudgesBy Ian Prasad Philbrick

appointed 3 justices as president. If he wins, he may get more appointments than would have.
In recent years, judges have retired in time to let the president they prefer fill their seats. The oldest justices today— , 76, & Alito, 74—are appointees. If they retired during a 2nd Trump admin, he could choose young replacements to cement control of the court for decades.

seem more likely to control the next year. If they do, they can block President from filling a vacancy, much as they did Barack in 2016. “If he were re-elected, he’d probably get to appoint one if not two members to the ,” Harris said of last week. She did not say how many appointees she may get if she wins.

also wants to enact & an code for , given the revelation that Thomas & Alito accepted luxury gifts w/o disclosing them. That’s unlikely if control the — & maybe even if do, thanks to the .

In the lower , can serve for life. So the more a president appoints, the more he or she can shape the country. hears only about 80 cases per year, meaning that lower courts are often the final arbiter on many issues. They set on , proceedings, disputes & enforcement, & on whether federal & rules are .

In a typical 4-yr term, a president replaces about ¼ of the country’s 870 active federal , across both federal district & appeals courts. filled 231 vacancies, & President may equal that number before the next takes over.

Partly as a result, Republican & Democratic presidents have each appointed about ½ of the judges on federal courts.

Nonilex

The appeals courts lean slightly , while the district courts lean (if you count senior judges who work less but still hear cases)…. The next president will likely be able to tip that balance, letting one party’s appointees make up a clear majority of judges.

The next president will also alter the courts’ , & makeup. Under , 76% of judicial nominees were , & 84% were …. Many had ties to the , a ** group. ’s appointees have been 63% & 61% . He has prioritized nominees who served as & lawyers, & his picks have tended to be more than those of past Democratic presidents.

A 2nd-term might have the edge over a 1st-term because a -controlled could block some of her appointees. Perhaps moderate Harris nominees would get through, though: Most of ’s appointees received bipartisan support. Another potential area of agreement is a bipartisan measure to incrementally increase the total number of federal district to ease rising caseloads. The bill passed the Senate in Aug but has yet to receive a vote.

Even as the will shape the , the judiciary may also shape the election. As in 2020, & have already asked federal , including those on , to resolve disputes about ballots before Election Day. Their rulings could determine the outcome of a close race.

Perhaps related, Americans’ faith in the has eroded in the era.

Unpopular rulings on , , presidential , & other issues — as well as the cases against , which will likely move forward if he loses — have driven down public in & the system.

That decline may be hard to reverse no matter which candidate prevails — especially if the courts play a role in deciding the winner.

@Nonilex If Harris has said anything about SCOTUS, I've missed it. Hoping she plans a "January surprise."