masto.ai is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general Mastodon server for all languages.

Administered by:

Server stats:

2.1K
active users

By

It was wrong to treat as a series of absences. The standard critique has always been that he lacks something that we imagine to be a prerequisite for high office: breeding, or grammar, or diplomacy, or business acumen, or love of country. And he does lack all those things, as well as pretty much any conventional…virtue you can name.


newyorker.com/magazine/dispatc

Nonilex

’s skills & talents go unrecognized when we see him as a conventional candidate—a person who seeks to explain policies that might improve lives, or who works to create the appearance of empathy. Yet this is our shortcoming more than his. Trump has always been a presence, not an absence: the presence of . What does this mean?

When the Soviets called their enemies “,” they turned the word into a meaningless insult. Putinist has preserved the habit: a “fascist” is anyone who opposes the wishes of a Russian . So Ukrainians defending their country from Russian invaders are “fascists.” This is a trick that has copied. He, like Vladimir , refers to his enemies as “fascists,” w/no significance at all. It is simply a term of opprobrium.

& are both, in fact, . And their use of the word, though meant to confuse, reminds us of one of fascism’s essential characteristics. A fascist is unconcerned w/the connection between & . He does not serve the ; the language serves him. When a fascist calls a liberal a “fascist,” the term begins to work in a different way, as the servant of a particular person, rather than as a bearer of meaning.

That’s quite a achievement. Faced w/complexity of , struggle w/the overwhelming volume of questions to be asked, answers to be offered. Like communism, fascism is an answer to all questions, but a different kind of answer. assures us that we can, thanks to science, find an underlying direction in all events, toward a better future. This is (/was) seductive. reduces the imbroglio of sensation to what the Leader says.

A has to tell a hundred stories, or a thousand. A has one story, which might not turn out to be true. A just has to be a . Because words do not attach to meanings, the stories don’t need to be consistent. They don’t need to accord w/external . A fascist storyteller just has to find a pulse & hold it. This can proceed through rehearsal, as w/ , or by way of trial & error, as w/ .

That requires presence, which has always had. His need not resonate w/you: probably, ’s & ’s would not have reached you, either. But it is nevertheless a talent. To be a & to call someone else a fascist requires a cunning that is natural to Trump. And in that naming of the , absurd as it is, we see the second major element of .

A Leader…initiates by choosing an . As the legal thinker Carl Schmitt maintained, the choice is arbitrary. It has little or no basis in . It takes its force from the decisive will of the Leader. People who watched ’s TV ads…had not been harmed by a person, or by an , or by a of . The magic lies in the daring it takes to declare a weaker group to be part of an overwhelming .

The 1 thing that is not arbitrary about the choice of an is that it must . The ads projected a fantasy of allowing millions of sex-changed foreigners to take jobs from Americans. This touches, all at once, on , , & vulnerability. We are unprotected & impoverished & will be replaced by something alien. And this is all orchestrated by a shadowy enemy in the background—in this case, a woman of color who knows how to laugh.

is an example of an unoriginal lie: conspirators will make you impotent & bring others to take your place in the world. The…complexity of the world resolves itself as a , just as the attendant is resolved by . This works w/almost any combination of enemies. It can be a conspiracy of politicians to kidnap babies, or a conspiracy of Jews to corrupt women. wins when the enmity summoned begins to tell the story itself.

@Nonilex one of the most astute insights into why Trump won and Harris lost. It was all about primal, atavistic instinct and motivation.

@Nonilex Or it can be a conspiracy of doctors, scientists, and government to poison you with #vaccines, ignoring the fact that they've saved hundreds of millions of lives. And on and on.

@Nonilex

Picking on the most vulnerable groups is one of the most vile things about fascism.

Right. So for the non-fascists among us, who exactly is the *real* enemy? Just the clown, Trump? Who else and why? Who supports him and why? What do we do with them?

Just observing and haphazardly characterizing reality is not enough to *understand* it, and act wisely. Even a stupid AI has to be able to answer the wh* questions:

Who? What? When? Why? How? etc.

Otherwise, there's no "intelligence" in it. Isn't the same true with humans?

@Nonilex , thanks for posting this!

@Nonilex
That's simplistic and not true. Ukrainians were victims of Stalin's agricultural collectivization, which was the first major failure of the new soviet system, and was conveniently attributed to Ukrainian farmers not wanting to participate in the policies. About 10 million Ukrainians died of hunger. That fact amplified preexisting nationalistic sentiments, to the point where Ukrainians later supported criminal nationalist Nazi collaborators, like Stepan Bandera. Hence, fascists.

@Nonilex It is possible to see Trump as a conventional candidate? Including his MAGA followers, who certainaly see him as different from the Democratic candidate(s).