Nonilex<p>&quot;We are not aware of any other case in which a state <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/legislature" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>legislature</span></a> — faced w/ a <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/FederalCourtOrder" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>FederalCourtOrder</span></a> declaring that its <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/electoral" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>electoral</span></a> plan unlawfully dilutes minority votes &amp; requiring a plan that provides an additional opportunity district — responded w/ a plan that the state concedes does not provide that <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/district" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>district</span></a>,” said US Circuit Judge Stanley Marcus, &amp; US District Judges Anna Manasco &amp; Terry Moorer.</p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Alabama" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Alabama</span></a> <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/VRA" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>VRA</span></a></p>