masto.ai is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general Mastodon server for all languages.

Administered by:

Server stats:

2.2K
active users

Is Watching the Rise of a
For most people, the will continue to operate as usual—until they don’t.

On Sept 20, 1938, a man who had witnessed the rise of packed his suitcases & fled his home in Berlin. He arranged to have smuggled separately a manuscript that he had drafted in secret over the previous 2 yrs. This book was a remarkable one. It clarified what was unfolding in Berlin…, the catalyst for its author’s flight.

theatlantic.com/magazine/archi

The Atlantic · America Is Watching the Rise of a Dual StateBy Aziz Huq

The man…was a Jewish labor lawyer named Ernst Fraenkel.He completed his manuscript…at UC, publishing it as The , w/the modest subtitle A Contribution to the Theory of .The book explains how the regime managed to keep on track a economy governed by stable —& maintain a day-to-day normalcy for many of its citizens—while at the same time establishing a domain of & state in order to realize its terrible vision of .

Fraenkel offered a simple, yet powerful, picture of how the & foundations of the Weimar Republic eroded, & were replaced by -style rule in which the commands of the Party & its leader became paramount. His perspective was not grounded in abstract political theory; it grew instead from his experience as a Jewish lawyer in Nazi Berlin representing & other disfavored clients.

Academic in tone, The sketches a template of emerging distilled from bloody & horrifying experience.

As Fraenkel explained it, a does not arise simply by snuffing out the ordinary system of rules, procedures, & precedents. To the contrary, that system—which he called the “normative state”—remains in place while dictatorial power spreads across society. What happens, Fraenkel explained, is insidious.

Rather than completely eliminating the normative state, the regime slowly created a parallel zone in which “unlimited arbitrariness & unchecked by any legal guarantees” reigned freely. In this domain, which Fraenkel called the “prerogative state,” ordinary didn’t apply. (A is one that allows a person such as a monarch to act without regard to the laws on the books; theorists from onward have offered various formulations of the idea.)

In this prerogative state, & other legal actors deferred to the hierarchies & ruthless expediencies of the regime.

The key here is that this prerogative state does not immediately & completely overrun the normative state. Rather, Fraenkel argued, create a zone that runs alongside the normative state. The 2 states cohabit uneasily & unstably. On any given day, people or cases could be jerked out of the normative state & into the prerogative one.

In July 1936, for example, Fraenkel won a case for employees of an association taken over by the . A few days later, he learned that the had seized the money owed to his clients & deposited it in the government’s coffers. Over time, the prerogative state would distort & slowly unravel the procedures of the normative state, leaving a smaller & smaller domain for ordinary .

…it was a mistake to think that even the would entirely dispense w/normal .…They had a complex, broadly economy to maintain. “A nation of 80M people,”…needs stable rules. The trick was to find a way to keep the going for Germans who supported or…tolerated the Nazis, while ruthlessly executing the ’s directives against the state’s enemies, real & perceived. could jog nicely alongside the brutal suppression of , & even .

Nonilex

…Today, we are witnessing the birth of a new . The has long had a normative state. That system was always imperfect. Our system, for example, sweeps in far too many people, for far too little security in exchange. Even so, it is recognizably part of the normative state.

What the administration & its allies are trying to build now, however, is not.

The list of measures purpose-built to cleave off a domain in which the does not apply grows by the day: the that bless & invite ; the of career lawyers at the & , across the govt, & snr agents; the AG’s command that attys obey over their understanding of the ; the appointment of people such as & , who…view loyalty to Trump as more compelling than their constitutional oath;

’s declaration that he & the AG are the sole authoritative interpreters of federal for the executive branch; the transformation of ordinary spending responsibilities into discretionary tools to punish partisan foes; the stripping of clearances from perceived enemies & opponents; the threat of prosecutions for deemed unfavorable by the president; & the verbal attacks on for enforcing the law.

The singular aim of these tactics is to construct a prerogative state where cruel caprice, not , rules. By no measure does the extent of law displaced in the first few months of the admin compare w/the huge tracts of the Weimar’s legal system eviscerated by the . But it is striking how Trump’s EOs reject some basic tenets of American constitutionalism—such as ’s power to impose binding rules on spending & regulation—w/o which the normative state cannot persist.

The CEOs who paid for & attended ’s second inauguration can look forward to the courts being open for the ordinary business of . So, too, can many citizens who pay little attention to politics expect to be unscarred by the . The normal criminal-justice system, if only in [Trump perceived] *nonpolitical* cases, will crank on. Outside the American prerogative state, much will remain as it was. The is too valuable to wholly dismantle.

For that reason, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that ’s lawyers—despite running roughshod over , the , the , & the —were somewhat slower to defy the federal courts, & have fast-tracked cases to , seeking a judicial imprimatur for novel . The , unlike the legislature, remain useful to an in a .

Building a need not end in : Vladimir ’s & ’s have followed the same model of the dual state that Fraenkel described, though neither has undertaken a mass-killing operation as the Nazis did [Putin has, just not within Russian borders on a genocidal scale]. Their deepest similarity, rather, is that both are intolerant of & leave the overwhelming majority of citizens alone.

The peril of the lies precisely in this capacity for targeted suppression. [Many]…people can ignore the construction of the simply because it does not touch their lives. They can turn away while dissidents & scapegoats lose their political . But once the prerogative state is built, as Fraenkel’s writing & experience suggest, it can swallow anyone.

@Nonilex @thetnholler.bsky.social

Now I understand the reference better than I did; political art, now better seen through the lenses of history.

@Nonilex Thanks for the lengthy summary, as it was quite informative! I will look at the article from @TheAtlantic later on, but the dual state seems to be the most accurate interpretation for what is going on.

I wonder if something similar has happened to Hungary 🇭🇺 & even Turkey 🇹🇷

@darnell @Nonilex I often refer to Hungary (my home country) as the “következmények nélküli ország”, a country without repercussions, so this largely tracks, even if not as overtly as Nazi Germany (or the speedrunning that Trump is doing right now); largely (I think) because at least some semblance of pretense and "checks & balances" need to be maintained towards the EU (in particular, to receive EU funding). But overall Hungary is tending towards a parallel reality existing for friends (and for foes) of the ruling party/Orbán