masto.ai is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general Mastodon server for all languages.

Administered by:

Server stats:

2.2K
active users

🚨🚨 Just released a 37-page ruling from Chief Judge James , denying the administration request to vacate its TROs preventing the government from enforcing the against .

🚨No one subject to the can be deported without a hearing.🚨

storage.courtlistener.com/reca

The US Court of Appeals for DC is still hearing ’s appeal & request to remove Judge this afternoon at 1:30PM.

Judge also finds that the Foreign Affairs Reform & Restructuring Act () protections likely remain available to removals.

Under FARRA, these plaintiffs could seek Convention Against () protections due to *where* they were being taken — has been accused of violations before.

Judge terrifyingly describes the prison knowing that:

- The admin admitted "many of the TdA members ... do not have criminal records”

- Several cases of misidentification have emerged

- The most senior ofcls signed a brief saying these detainees would not suffer "irreparable harm"

govt affidavit saying: "While it is true that many of the TdA members removed under the AEA do not have criminal records in the United States"

storage.courtlistener.com/reca

DOJ brief signed by ’s AG & the senior leadership at the saying, "Plaintiffs have not established irreparable harm."

storage.courtlistener.com/reca

Judge on how the admin tried to evade courts:

"[T]he most reasonable inference is that it hustled people onto those planes in the hopes of evading an injunction or perhaps preventing them from requesting the habeas hearing to which the Government now acknowledges they are entitled."

Nonilex

atty starts by arguing ’s order infringes on the powers of the Executive Branch.

Judge immediately interrupts by saying it is totally under the judicial powers to review whether individuals qualified under the & were denied to prove they were not members of the gang .

Judge says the problem isn’t with the proclamation but the implementation. If intends to deport only members of , the fact that nonmembers are being deported doesn’t align with his proclamation. The Temporary Restraining Order issued by Judge allows the admin to detain but prohibits removal to another country until the detainees have been given an opportunity to argue that they were not TdA members & therefore were not subject to the .

The atty just told the judge she is incorrectly reading . 🤦🏼‍♀️

Ryan Goodman noted that Judge in his ruling this morning correct interprets Ludecke.

“Chief Judge Boasberg read landmark Supreme Court case of Ludecke the right way!

“Ludecke Court assessed the factual question of whether WWII terminated.

“So too can courts assess Trump ‘invasion’ etc claims.”

Judge just said “ got better treatment under the

They had hearing boards.

The people deported had no opportunity to apply for habeas. The planes started leaving 2 hours after Trump’s proclamation was signed.

admin argues that relief can only be sought by .

Judge asks why not ? If individual’s argument is that they should not be subject to then habeas is not the correct path. The individuals are being removed not detained. They aren’t even arguing against their detention, they’re objecting to their removal to an prison. Without process they aren’t being given opportunity to defend their removal subject to the AEA.

Judge: Your argument is that this is an intrusion on presidential powers. But removing individuals without process, without giving them the opportunity to say they aren’t members of the TdA is a misreading of the , the . And that is subject to judicial review. The president has to follow the constitution & laws just like everybody else.

Plaintiffs atty now up. Lee Gelernt from the ACLU.

Plans to address courts do have the power of judicial review.

First wants to clarify that the district court is not ordering the individuals be returned from the El Salvador prison.

The govt saying that people have ability to seek relief through is illusory.

If you’re not seeking release it doesn’t have to be a habeas claim.

Reminder ’s order is a TEMPORARY Restraining Order, to halt removals under the until he has time to find the facts, consider & its implementation.

The multiple emergency hearings over the last week have been regarding the admin’s refusal to obey the order.

Most of Gelernt’s time was spent discussing whether habeas claims should have been filed in TX bc the 5 named plaintiffs are currently held there.

1. This is a class action suit. The 5 named plaintiffs stand in for numerous others. Gelernt said because the govt is refusing to share info, it’s impossible to know where any of them are so he would have to file in every state.

2. Habeas’ core relief is release. Release is not being sought in *this* case. Enjoining removal to a foreign country is.

Well audio went out, then when it came back, it was another case at the appeals court. We’ll have find out what else was discussed later. 🤷🏼‍♀️

admin doesn't need to give notice to people it wants to deport, argues

A federal appeals court has finished hearing arguments over whether to lift a judge’s against Trump’s use of a wartime authority to quickly deport alleged members of a gang.

As the hearing came to a close, a DOJ atty told the court that he didn’t think the govt needed to give notice to individuals it wants to summarily remove under the .


cnn.com/politics/live-news/tru

CNN · Trump holds Cabinet meeting as administration’s deportations face legal challengesBy Antoinette Radford

“Does the government agree that they’re entitled to notice that they are being removed based on their status as a member of Tren de Aragua under the president’s proclamation under the () & an opportunity to challenge that before they are removed from the United States?” appeals court Judge Patricia Millett asked DOJ atty Drew Ensign.

“Your honor, we don’t agree to the notice point,”the atty replied. “We agree that if you bring habeas you can raise such challenges,” a reference to habeas corpus, the constitutional right to protection against illegal detention.

[these petitions would need to be filed from a prison where they are subject to frightening violations]

The hearing concluded after just over an hour. The 3-judge panel did not say when it would rule, but could at any time.

Holy crap

In a new affidavit in by someone turned around in , they swear the following:

"Within a couple of minutes of take off I heard two US government officials talking and they said 'there is an order saying we can’t take off but we already have.'"

storage.courtlistener.com/reca

Woo hoo!!!!

🚨NEW: The US Court of Appeals for DC just DENIED 's request to stay Judge 's halt on the use of the .

The decision is 2-1, w/ Trump appointee Judge Walker dissenting [shocker] on jurisdictional [technical, not merits] grounds, arguing the lawsuit should have been brought in Texas.

storage.courtlistener.com/reca

@Nonilex Listening in on this one, certainly sounds like the judge(s) already have serious doubts that anything has been done incorrectly by Boasberg.

@Nonilex Two hours after the proclamation was signed. You don’t round people up, shame their heads, load them on a plane, taxi & takeoff all within 2 hours without prior planning.

@liquor_american

No. If their argument law is being misinterpreted & inappropriately applied that can be reviewed by the courts & corrected by the government.

I assume you’re talking about their immunity decision. That was regarding the president’s acts within his official duties.

@Nonilex

Excellent reminder that quite literally the Trump administration tantrum is about a TRO, but of course it's about so much more.

@Nonilex Henderson finally spoke up, to wit, "Do we wrap this up now?"

@ChrisHolladay @Nonilex They will deserve every cent - the treatment these people suffered is unspeakable.

@Nonilex ohhh Boasberg is gonna love that! Wonder if he'll receive this info before tomorrow's hearing?

@Nonilex the part of me that thinks fascist rule is here for a while is relieved to see the tyrant’s apparatchiks acting like schoolchildren who just got away with something. Let’s keep fighting.

Of course the order didn’t say they couldn’t take off, it said they couldn’t take people to el salvador. So there is that.

@Nonilex Contempt of court much? Sounds a bit like it!

@Nonilex did you see the line about threatening them to sign confessions?...!!!

@Nonilex "brought in Texas" == "brought in a court we own"

@Nonilex
Yays for justice
See how fast he runs to his paid bitches on SCOTUS.

@Nonilex They’re trying to get this case moved to Republican hack in Texas

@Nonilex Ooh, Trumpty won’t like this! Calls for another judge to be impeached incoming!

@Nonilex That last sentence there seems to be one Trump and his puppetmasters have real problems with. Aside from the fact that "Constitution" has too many syllables for him to read it without using his finger...

@Nonilex But he won't. And he controls the marshalls.

"El juez afirma que el problema no radica en la proclamación, sino en su implementación. Si Trump pretende deportar solo a miembros de la TdA, el hecho de que se deporte a personas que no son miembros no concuerda con su proclamación. La Orden de Restricción Temporal (TRO) emitida por el juez Boasberg permite al gobierno detener, pero prohíbe la deportación a otro país hasta que los detenidos hayan tenido la oportunidad de argumentar que no eran miembros de la TdA y, por lo tanto, no estaban sujetos a la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros.

#ley #inmigración"

@Nonilex