(Copying thread here because my friendica replies don't seem to be federating)
Asynchronous, but also extremely non-linear, and heterogeneous across sub-cultures. Like, Mastodon/pleorama/misskey already have a massive chunk of trans and tech and furry subcultures. A bunch of scientist tried it, but it hasn't quite been enough to mainstream it and a lot left. There are barely any musos yet.
1/3
But at some point, some of those sub-cultures will have a big enough community here to to actually be attractive to others in those sub-cultures, at which point more will stay, and the community is likely to grow rapidly. I think it's sub-cultures that are aware of, and whose interests intersect with, privacy concerns and the effect of corporate controlled social media on public policy and social and individual health and thinking that will grow fastest.
2/3
Journalists will be next to last because they absolutely need the network effect. Politicians and corporations don't give a shit about privacy, or actively benefit from breaches, so they will be last.
3/3
@naught101 The problem is partly that on the Fedi the engagement is the difference between a meaningful chat with a friend vs getting 50 pats on the back by strangers. The convo is more impactful but the number of pats people get on other platforms make it seem inconsequential. One supper simple tweek that could help is showing the # of & types of engagements a post gets as you first see it. It would boost engagement with the post & make the poster “feel” more seen. @atomicpoet
@atomicpoet Mine is roughly the same here with way less followers & following. I get good engagement but I curated the fuck out of who I followed & who I let follow me there & do the same here. I’ve just heard this complaint from people over & over. One thing I don’t get here is the massive spike of 1,000s of likes that happened on Twitter but even there I understood how ephemeral that was. I do miss not seeing who’s getting traction so I can more easily boost the people who aren’t. @naught101
You post a lot of fediverse and related contet, which is definitely a primary topic here. I don't know what your content was like on twitter, but if it was similar, I'm not surprised, because I think the audience there was much less focussed on the how and why of the platform, and more focussed on mainstream content.
I don't get heaps of engagement on my posts (I don't mind), but I do notice that anything fediverse related gets a lot more boost and favourites.
@naught101 @atomicpoet @Pineywoozle For me, the lack of superficial engagement is a plus to being here. I don't want to be incentivised to share things that will get likes rather than foster meaningful or helpful interactions. I appreciate having windows into the experience of thoughful, knowledgeable people who don't post hot takes. It's a very different experience, and one that I value.
Yeeeeah. It's chill, like 98% of the time. Totally agree. Good feels.
I find that Lemmy is a good complement, it's a better place to have banter-y arguments or longer discussions of issues, for me.