#politics #trump #thirdterm #constituion
Joyce Vance Civil Discourse “Trump’s Third Term” 4/1/2025
[It makes me sick to my stomach that 45% of Americans still think he is just fine. But it is not the majority.]
![Joyce Vance Civil Discourse “Trump’s Third Term” 4/1/2025
[It makes me sick to my stomach that 45% of Americans still think he is just fine. And 50% with immigration.]
In the most current Reuters/Ipsos poll, 45% of Americans approve of Trump's job performance. He comes in slightly higher, around 50%, when people are asked about immigration. George W. Bush had a 90% approval rating following Sept. 11, 2001.
Still, the notion of Trump running for a third term in office continues to surface. At a House Republican retreat in January, Trump told the crowd, in that way he has of suggesting he is about to do something impermissible, “I think I’'m not allowed to run again.” Turning to Speaker Mike Johnson he asked, “Am I allowed to run again, Mike?” The answer is resoundingly no. The 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, added in 1951 after President Franklin Roosevelt’s four terms in office, provides that “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once.”
But that didn’t keep Steve Bannon from calling for Trump to run again, during a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). He told the crowd, "We want Trump in 28.”](https://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/114/263/389/045/222/415/original/2b428a1fc5ac4b8d.jpeg "Joyce Vance Civil Discourse “Trump’s Third Term” 4/1/2025
[It makes me sick to my stomach that 45% of Americans still think he is just fine. And 50% with immigration.]
In the most current Reuters/Ipsos poll, 45% of Americans approve of Trump's job performance. He comes in slightly higher, around 50%, when people are asked about immigration. George W. Bush had a 90% approval rating following Sept. 11, 2001.
Still, the notion of Trump running for a third term in office continues to surface. At a House Republican retreat in January, Trump told the crowd, in that way he has of suggesting he is about to do something impermissible, “I think I’'m not allowed to run again.” Turning to Speaker Mike Johnson he asked, “Am I allowed to run again, Mike?” The answer is resoundingly no. The 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, added in 1951 after President Franklin Roosevelt’s four terms in office, provides that “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once.”
But that didn’t keep Steve Bannon from calling for Trump to run again, during a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). He told the crowd, \"We want Trump in 28.”")
Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
#constituion
0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread
@trabern There's not a metric anymore for, "Exactly how perfectly this is 'talking out of his ass'?"
Replied in thread
Meanwhile the answer was easy : US Constitution Article 3 Section 3
Section 3.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
She could replied that the US is not at war , so it could not be considered as a treason….
But ofc that means knowing the constitution .
( I don t bellieve that people should shout treason for any reason ) .
Good read
There will be lots of lawsuits. This is a Constitutional protection.
"The birthright citizenship order goes into effect in 30 days and prohibits federal agencies from issuing citizenship documents (such as passports) to the—to be clear—citizens in question.
But that's simply not how any of this works. "
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/01/trump-birthright-citizenship-executive-order-14th-amendment-still-exists/
#Birthright #Constitution #Trump #14thAmendment
Mother JonesActually, the 14th Amendment still existsTrump signed an executive order purporting to rewrite birthright citizenship. That's not how the Constitution works.
Sharing as the incoming emperor apparently hasn't read the #Constituion.
Amendment XIV
Section 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Replied in thread
@piratesin I'm volunteering and I hope to find a few more people from #MastIndia who care about our #democracy and #constituion.
If you agree the cost of being neutral is too much, please join us. Making a change is possible, but only if a lot of us stop sitting in the gallery and watching.
Replied in thread
@benoitb @LesRepliques
Oui dans le preambule de la constitution de 1946 qui est repris dans le preambule de la constitution de 1958
…
5. Chacun a le devoir de travailler et le droit d'obtenir un emploi. Nul ne peut être lésé, dans son travail ou son emploi, en raison de ses origines, de ses opinions ou de ses croyances
…
Constitution Mobile App Launched by Pakistan
https://thenewstoday24.com/constitution-mobile-app-launched-by-pakistan/
Today 24 NewsConstitution Mobile App Launched by Pakistan - Today 24 NewsConstitution Mobile Appdevelopment download tracking banking hbl mcb frp habib askari bank online registration company apk Android ioS Askari
Catching up on the great new Simon Schama documentary. The second episode closed with a great line which I’ll paraphrase as follows:
The price of liberty is eternal vigilance
That is the constant narrative of my second semester constitutional law lectures.