masto.ai is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general Mastodon server for all languages.

Administered by:

Server stats:

2.2K
active users

The activists included leader &his ideological soulmate, a hard-edged activist named , the wife of Justice .
“Ginni really wanted to build an organization & be a movement leader. Leonard [Leo] was going to be the conduit of that” said a person familiar….
She also had… , the… who helped Thomas & her husband in many ways, from to picking up payments for their great-nephew.

…the ruling… upended nearly 100 years of .

The movement seized the moment w/greater success than any other group, & the consequences have shaped American & in dramatic ways.

From those early discussions among , & would spring a billion-dollar force that has helped remake the & longstanding legal on , & many other issues.

It funded scholars to devise theories to challenge , helped to state general willing to apply those theories & launched lavish campaigns for judicial nominees who would cite those theories in their rulings from the bench.

The movement’s triumphs are now visible but its engine remains hidden: A billion-dollar network of groups, most of which are registered as or orgs. Taking advantage of gaps in , they shield the IDs of most of their & some of the recipients of the . Among those who’ve been paid by the groups are… individuals w/close personal ties to — including a whopping $7M to a group run by a close friend & his wife.

They also include a for-profit business for which himself is chairman & which received tens of millions… from his network.

Leo’s role as the central figure in this movement has long been known, culminating in his acquisition last year of what many believe to be the largest in history. Few are aware of the extent to which the movement’s baby steps were taken in concert with .

Nonilex

Two months before the decision…, — later to play a role in ’s false claims about the 2020 elections — filed papers for to create a ** group of a type that ultimately benefited from the decision. was one of two directors listed on a separate application to conduct business in the state of Virginia. was president. She signed it on New Year’s Eve of 2009, & provided much of the initial .

A key aide, Sarah Field, would come aboard to help manage the group, which they called .

After Liberty Central went public, it provoked an outcry over a justice’s wife promoting causes like overturning that were before her husband’s court. Leo & Thomas changed gears. His network reactivated a dormant group, the , which would go on to become a major supplier of before the nation’s highest court.

She () created a for-profit consulting biz using a similar name — — that enabled her to perform consulting work for activist grps.

The supplied some of her biz: Docs indicate ordered at least 1 recipient of his groups’ funds, , to pay for unspecified work, acc/to a story….

washingtonpost.com/investigati

The Washington Post · Judicial activist directed fees to Clarence Thomas’s wife, urged ‘no mention of Ginni’By Emma Brown

Now, is a focus of interest from congressional committees probing ’s disclosures. have demanded that & provide a list of “gifts, payments, or other items of value” they’ve given & her husband.

Meanwhile, Leo’s network of *nonprofits* — whose annual donations have skyrocketed into the hundreds of millions of dollars — is the subject of an investigation by the DC AG….

the probes have combined to raise the question of whether ’s groups have taken advantage of lax to send additional business & funds to , among others…. That would be legal as long as Thomas was providing services commensurate w/the payments.

“The real question then is, ‘what is Ginni Thomas qualified to do, what did they pay her to do, and was it fair market value?’” said Laura Solomon, a PA tax atty who reps hundreds of & other orgs….

Many people trace the start of the movement to 1982, the year of the founding of the , which provided a forum for students & profs w/conservative ideas to incubate their theories.

But the movement that has had such a profound impact on the courts today — one that involves & , more than legal theories or principles — gained steam in the wake of the decision.

The case followed a highly unusual path —one blazed by a five-justice majority who seemed determined to strike a blow against restrictions.

Initially, the dispute centered on whether a conservative ’s unflattering documentary on fmr Democratic presidential candidate violated campaign finance .

Instead of resolving the case along the lines argued by the lawyers, the justices took the unusual step of asking for re-arguments based on a sweeping question — whether they should prior decisions approving laws that limited on campaigns.

The re-argument took place on Sept 9, 2009. Two months later, on Nov 6, filed an IRS application on behalf of to form the group that became Inc.

…The application was approved 7 days before joined the 5-4 majority on a decision that would open the door to a new era of major on groups like the one his wife was forming. After putting up $500k, the lion’s share of her ’s seed money, held an event for at his palatial home in Dallas. The group later made clear its goal was disassembling President Barack ’s agenda, mainly the .

Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Ronald Reagan appointee, assumed in his majority opinion in that & around such groups would be transparent. Justice , in his concurring opinion, argued against “forcibly disclosed donor information,” which could “pre-empt citizens’ exercise of their First Amendment rights.”

The decision — which extended to , & — effectively curbed efforts to rein in spending, while paving the way for follow-up rulings from courts & the that would unleash additional billions of dollars in donations. Those donors would spawn a boom in ” & “” groups as vehicles for spending on political activity.

Excellent reporting by @HeidiReports it continues & gets even crazier w/millions going to ; characters such as , & more submit amicus briefs & attempt to influence ; a clerk & assoc briefs SCOTUS on the anti- anti- case; the 2016 election; groomed judges , & get appointed.
Recommended read.