masto.ai is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A general Mastodon server for all languages.

Administered by:

Server stats:

2.2K
active users

Nonilex

Sweeping bill to overhaul would add 6 justices

The legislation by Sen (D-OR) is one of the most ambitious efforts to date to remake the following
controversies over rulings & .

A sweeping bill introduced by a Democratic senator Wednesday would greatly increase the size of the Supreme Court, make it harder for the justices to overturn , require justices to undergo & remove roadblocks for high court .


washingtonpost.com/politics/20

The Washington Post · Sweeping bill to overhaul Supreme Court would add six justicesBy Justin Jouvenal

The legislation by Sen (D-OR) is one of the most ambitious proposals to remake a high court that has suffered a sharp decline in its public approval after a string of contentious decisions & scandals in recent years. It has little chance of passing at the moment, since have generally opposed efforts to overhaul the court.

…said the goal of the bill is to restore public confidence in a battered institution. He said he hopes to get parts of the bill passed, even if the whole package is not embraced by lawmakers.

“It’s not an atomic secret that the process for selecting justices is politicized,” said. “You’ve got this thoroughly politicized process resulting in a that now frequently issues sweeping rulings to overturn laws & upend precedents.”

#law#SCOTUS#ethics

“We are proposing a way to restore some balance between the 3 branches of government,” Sen added.

The bill’s most significant measure would increase the number of justices from 9 to 15 over the course of 12 years. The staggered format over 2 or 3 administrations is aimed at diminishing the chance that one party would pack the courts with its nominees.

Link to bill, summary & full text:

wyden.senate.gov/news/press-re

www.wyden.senate.govWyden Introduces Sweeping Court Reforms to Restore Public Trust as Supreme Court Faces Legitimacy Crisis | U.S. Senator Ron Wyden of OregonThe Official U.S. Senate website of Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon

During the rollout, each president would approve justices in the first & third year of their terms.

The bill would also require a ruling by ⅔ of the high court & the circuit courts of appeals, rather than a simple majority, to overturn a passed by . said the current court has been too quick to discard & curtail by narrow majorities.

The would also require nominees to be automatically scheduled for a vote in the if their nominations have lingered in committee for >180 days.

The measure would prevent senators from blocking a president’s nominees by refusing to hold a vote on them, as then-Senate Majority Leader (R-KY) did after President Barack ’s nomination of in 2016.

held open the seat that had been occupied by Justice , a , until became president. Trump put forward Neil M. .

McConnell said ’s nomination came too close to the 2016 presidential election, but he later helped push through the nomination of [less than 1 month prior to the 2020 election]…, after the death of Justice , a **.

#law#ethics#SCOTUS

[’s maneuvering]…helped create the supermajority that now dominates the court.

Another provision in ’s bill would expand the number of federal circuits from 13 to 15, adding >100 district court & >60 appellate-level judges.

justices must report income, dividends, property sales & gifts, among other things, but the bill would bolster financial checks, disclosures & other transparency measures.

It would require the to initiate an of the justices’ tax returns each year, release the results & make the tax filings public. Nominees to the court would have to disclose 3 yrs of tax returns.

Another measure would allow a two-thirds vote of the court to force a fellow justice to from a case.

#law#SCOTUS#ethics

Each justice would be required to publicly release their opinions & disclose how they voted on issues considered on an emergency basis, sometimes referred to as the . Such decisions, which have become more common & increasingly controversial in recent years, don’t identify how each justice voted.

#law#SCOTUS#ethics

@Nonilex This is good but I can't find where he addressed life time appointments... or am I just dense lol 👀

@Aviva_Gary

You are not dense at all 🤓🧐

I couldn’t find term limits addressed anywhere in the bill.

@Nonilex

Would this change matter? What if the vote was scheduled? Wouldn't the Republican majority just vote no ad nauseum?

@Nonilex I honestly didn't think Wyden had it in him. This is a very sensible and pragmatic bill!

@Nonilex just in time for trump to lock down the court for the next half century.

@Nonilex

Wyden's bill should also centralize jurisdiction to create nationwide injunctions against the USG into a single court in DC. Local injunctions would stay in each federal district.

This should stop the forum shopping by arch-conservatives, looking for a lone Trump judge in West Palm or the Texas Panhandle, as they attempt to disrupt the entire USG.

@Nonilex Nine is already too many. The splits in decisions are along political lines, not legal reasoning ones. Five or seven is the number.